Chilling results emerged this week from an online survey by One Poll about social networking and school children. So damning is the report about the negative influence of such websites as Facebook, MySpace and Bebo on educational standards, that it might even constitute legitimate cause to ban school children from these websites altogether.

The survey collected evidence from 500 teachers across the UK, with a shocking two thirds reporting that children are rushing through their homework in order to spend time online, mainly on highly popular social networking sites such as the ubiquitous Facebook. Half of the teachers surveyed were also confident that what they described as an “obsession” with such websites was distracting the attention of children from their classwork, preventing them from making crucial progress at school.

We can add to this direct evidence the reasonable assumption that young students’ obsessive use of Facebook adds to social cliques, bullying and popularity contests; all negative factors detracting from concentration and learning, both in school and out.

Perhaps more worryingly still, the teachers polled drew a direct correlation between the increased use of computers and keyboards in the digital age and the declining standards in writing, with 58% stating that children’s handwriting and spelling were suffering as a result of their dependency on typing and spellchecks.

With the abbreviations of ‘text speak’ creeping ever more into everyday writing and conversation, and less and less children reading books, are we heading towards an entire generation of illiterate (Facebook-fluent) youngsters?

Janie Burt, a spokeswoman for JCA, the company that commissioned the poll, warned against the dire consequences for the children’s futures and chances of continuing into higher education when social networking is “affecting their grades because they fail to complete their homework on time or to the standard required,” and they are “unable to concentrate in class.”

Academic concerns aside, the impact of social networking and the disturbing reality of children leading a virtual, voyeuristic existence, are also reported to be having a deep and damaging impact on the evolution of their sense of self and their awareness of the world around them, not to mention their perceptions of human interaction and relationships. As Burt explains, “rather than relying on life experiences, educational travel and face to face interaction with others, children are becoming obsessed with social networking and this is shaping their attitudes instead.”

One cannot help but fear for the maturity and development of a generation of children whose experiences of human interaction and behaviour are shaped by who has ‘poked’ them on Facebook or added them as a virtual ‘friend’. The voyeuristic nature of online social networking sites, where users create avatars and images of themselves and their lives to project a socially desirable existence, often distorts the reality of growing up and is likely to be extremely disorientating and damaging to children. Often users are able to create a fake veneer of popularity and flashy, exciting experiences using photographs and ‘status updates’, which can leave less ‘popular’ children feeling worthless and devalued by comparison.

Added to this are the raft of obvious concerns about online safety, with social networking sites providing copious opportunities for children to be approached and contacted by adults posing as their peers. A recent computer monitoring software report revealed that 89% of inappropriate sexual solicitations are made either in chat rooms or via instant messaging systems such as that recently added to the Facebook service. Whilst the site does attempt to protect the safety of its users by allowing them to choose to ‘accept’ or ‘deny’ friend requests, these do not prevent another user who is not their ‘friend’ from sending them a message, nor from disguising their identity in order to approach children.

With 4 million children posting content to the web every day, less and less time is being spent concentrating on their education, whether it is because they are on Facebook when they should be doing their homework, not concentrating in class, or failing to learn to write and spell correctly because they are so busy typing and writing in text message abbreviations.

I would like to hear any strong counter argument to the suggestion that school children simply shouldn’t be allowed on social networking websites such as Facebook. I can understand the value of the internet as a learning tool under controlled conditions, but beyond that it should surely be a predominantly adult zone.

The impact on their education is dire and is eventually going to produce an entire generation with a less-than-literate workforce. Keeping them off these sites will improve their spelling, concentration, homework and handwriting according to hundreds of teachers who know them and understand their potential best, whilst their personal safety and cultural experience will both be vastly improved. It must be a win-win situation.

, ,
Trackback

16 Comments

  1. I completely agree – I absoulutely do not know what 4 million children are doing on the internet everyday. It is unhealthy, it contains a wealth of damaging information and dodgy sites they shouldn’t be coming across, it exposes them to hundreds of dangers and there have been countless cases in the media where children have come to harm after meeting people they have met online.

    To me it is as much an obvious no-child-zone as a nightclub – it is simply inappropriate. Facebook started as a networking site for university students and if you ask me it should have stayed that way. For children and grown adults to be on there is just weird and wrong. People use it for all the wrong reasons.

  2. Elizabeth A @ 2010-11-23 14:15

    Don’t children have a human right to access the internet like anyone else? Isnt it a bit draconian to choose to ‘ban’ them – that should surely be the choice of each individual parent?

  3. Elizabeth A: no they don’t. No more than they have a human right to attend a nightclub or go into a pub – they are banned from these places because they are dangerous and inappropriate for children.

    I agree with the author that the internet should have only very limited uses for children and that social networking simply shouldn’t be one of them.

    What do children need to be on facebook for? They see each other every day at school – it’s not as if they’re using it to stay in touch with old friends.

    I think it is a very great shame that so many parents have such little control over what their children are doing on the internet and I do think Facebook should definitely be changed so that you have to be 18 or over

  4. I have two children, of 12 and 7. They don’t have a great interest in facebook, they prefer to play with their friends at their houses or outside. My 12 year old did recently ask about Facebook but wasn’t particularly bothered when my wife and I decided to not allow him to join.

  5. School children unfortunately are simply lazier, more spoilt and less motivated to work hard these days.

    I don’t really think the internet has that much to do with it in isolation – I think it is the whole lifestyle that children generally lead these days and their general attitudes and young peoples’ society.

    I am a teacher and I have found that in my 30 year career the manner, politeness and general demeanour of children has simply gone down, down, downhill.

    I don’t think banning children from facebook or the internet would really make any difference at all to the standards of their writing.

  6. It’s such a measure of our modern society that this incredible resource which should be so wonderful and such a great transformer of education and learning has become yet another danger to our children and yet another method for teenagers to be inappropriate.

    Imagine all the things humankind could have done with the internet. And what have we made the most popualar phenomenon on there? A website that allows us to essentially show off how popular we are, post silly amounts of photos and spy on each other. No intellectual value whatsoever. Brilliant.

  7. Does anyone else think it’d be more effective if we took mobile phones away from kids?

    All they’re ever doing is texting and typing into them – that’s half the reason they’re not concentrating surely, and it seems to be the biggest problem for spelling too

    Plus a lot of this unhealthy social culture would be curtailed if they had less means to be able to contact one another outside school.

    Not that it would ever happen though – they’re all surgically attached and addicted to them these days, it’s very sad.

    In my day you would go out and play with the kids who lived in the same street as you and you’d see the other kids at school and play in the playground with real balls and things!

  8. I agree taking both mobile phones and facebook access away from children would help but it is simply too late now as they have become completely indispensible to people of all ages.

    It’s sad to think we coped perfectly fine without them just a decade ago

  9. Oh for goodness sake just let children be children. It’s just a social website – most of them just want to chat and share pics with their friends.

    This is a typical example of adults jumping to conclusions and letting a small minority blacken the reputation of ‘kids’ as a whole – just like hoodies etc.

    Only a couple of months ago everyone was moaning and complaining that exam results are getting better and better and now everyone’s getting all a’s and a*’s and how that’s just silly – but now you’re all getting your knickers in a twist over kids not doing well enough – make your minds up!

  10. Nicola Hartley @ 2010-11-24 15:56

    Lottie: “Oh for goodness sake just let children be children” – that is exactly what we wish they would do – it isn’t natural or right for children to be spending hours on end cooped up in their bedrooms writing messages on social networking sites, often to people they have never met before- if only children WOULD just ‘be children’ – go outside and play with their friends and pick up a book now and then, we wouldn’t have all this to worry about.

  11. Perhaps the onus should be on the schools themselves to be stricter – I think schools should simply ban children from bringing in their own mobile phones or accessing the internet whilst at school.

  12. I agree that responsibility does have to be shared – parent’s can’t be held responsible for everything.

    So I think, as I totally agree with the author that children should be banned from facebook for all the reasons in this article which add up to a very strong argument, that facebook should start taking some of the responsibility by banning children from registering for an account.

    I know people could still say they were over 18 online etc. but at least it would give parents a stronger position to help them to put their foot down at home if the website itself admitted it was not suitable for children.

  13. Natalie I agree

    I just can’t believe what is happening to children these days.

    Behaviour and standards of education are just getting worse and worse. It is so sad.

  14. Alison Freeman @ 2010-11-25 00:20

    I completely agree with the author here. Children not only have difficulty with writing and spelling, they are unable to look another person in the eye and have a conversation with them. We are raising a generation who will be isolated and lonely and incapable of simple human interaction. It is a tragedy.

  15. [...] e.politics: online advocacy tools & tactics » Online Advocacy Tools: Social Networks School Children Should Be Banned From Facebook | Oxbridge Essays Google's OpenSocial Is Not a Facebook Killer – NYTimes.com [...]

  16. talia alexander @ 2011-11-14 21:15

    i am a 15 year old girl . i strongly agree with the points being made

Add your comment now